Juvenile Defendant’s True Findings Affirmed, Reversed

I. Whether the court erred in denying B.T.E.’s motion to dismiss based upon Ind. Code § 31-37-11-2; and
II. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support the juvenile court’s true findings that B.T.E. committed the delinquent acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute attempted aggravated battery and conspiracy to commit aggravated battery as level 3 felonies . . .
Indianapolis juvenile defense attorney Randall Parr defends juveniles accused of crimes, in addition to defending families against Department of Child Services (DCS) and Child Protective Services (CPS) allegations, including CHINS and Termination of Parental Rights proceedings.  Speak with him immediately to protect your rights.